ÌìÏÂÉúÃü¿ÆÑ§Ç°Ñض¯Ì¬Öܱ¨£¨°Ë£©
£¨05.10¡ª05.16 / 2010£©
Ò»¾º¼¼¹ú¼Ê¼¯ÍÅ:ÌÕ¹úÐÂ
¡¡¡¡±¾Öܶ¯Ì¬°üÀ¨ÒÔÏÂÄÚÈÝ£ºÂѳ²¼¤ËØÔÐͪÇýʹÈéÏÙ¸Éϸ°û±¬·¢¶¯Ì¬×ª±ä£» VEçúçêËáõ¥¿ÉÏÔ×ÅÒÖÖÆÖ×Áöϸ°ûÉú³¤£»·¢Ã÷ÒÖÖÆÎ¸°©µÄÖ÷Òª»ùÒò£»Ï¸°ûÓë×éÖ¯ÁÆ·¨ÓëÁÙ´²Ó¦ÓÃÖ®¼äµÄ¾àÀ룻³ÉÉú³ÝÇ»ð¤Ä¤¹ÌÓвãÀïÓÐÒ»ÀàиÉϸ°ûȺ£»ÀÏÊóipsϸ°û12ºÅȾɫÌåÓ¡¼£»ùÒòÒ쳣ĬȻ¡£
1. Âѳ²¼¤ËØÔÐͪÇýʹÈéÏÙ¸Éϸ°û±¬·¢¶¯Ì¬×ª±ä
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿
¡¡¡¡ 2010-5-10 9:22:45 Nature£ºÏã¸ÛÂê¼ÎÁÒÒ½ÔºµÄ°©Ö¢Ñо¿Ö°Ô±·¢Ã÷£¬Âѳ²¼¤ËØÔÐͪÔڸıäÈéÏÙ¸Éϸ°û·½Ãæ¼ç¸ºÁËÖ÷ÒªµÄ½ÇÉ«¡£ÀÏÊóÑо¿Åú×¢£¬ÔÚÔ¾µÄϰë¸öÖÜÆÚÔÐÍªÉøÍ¸»áµÖ´ï·åÖµ£¬´Ëʱ¸Éϸ°ûºÍÏà½üϸ°û×îÏÈÏ໥½»Á÷£¬ÇýʹÕý³£µÄÈéÏÙ¸Éϸ°ûÊýÄ¿À©Ôö£¬Õâ¾Í¿ÉÄܵ¼ÖÂÇéÐθıäʹµÃ°©Ö¢Ò×ÓÚ±¬·¢¡£Ö±µ½ÏÖÔÚ£¬ÆÕ±é¿´·¨ÒÔΪÔÚ³ÉÄêÅ®ÐÔÈé·¿ÖУ¬ÈéÏÙ¸Éϸ°ûÒ»Ñùƽ³£ÊDz»»îÔ¾µÄ£¬ÕâÏî¹ØÓںɶûÃɸıäÈéÏÙ¸Éϸ°ûµÄÑо¿ÎªÈéÏÙ°©³õÆÚµÄϸ°ûÉú³¤¿ªÆôÁËеÄÃ÷È··½·¨£¬ÓÐÀûÓÚ¿ª·¢ÐµĸÉϸ°û°ÐÏò¶¨Î»ÒªÁì¡£ÕâÊǵÚÒ»¸ö¹ØÓÚÔÐͪÇýʹÈéÏÙ¸Éϸ°û±¬·¢¶¯Ì¬×ª±äµÄÖ¤¾Ý£¬ÕâÖÖ¼¤»î»úÖÆÎªÏ¸°ûת±äÀú³ÌµÄ¿ªÆôÌṩÁËʱ»ú£¬²¢×îÖÕµ¼ÖÂÈéÏÙ°©µÄ±¬·¢¡£
¡¾µãÆÀ¡¿
¡¡¡¡µãÆÀ£º·¢Ã÷¼¤ËضÔÈéÏÙ¸Éϸ°ûµÄµ÷Àí×÷Óã¬ÓÐÖúÓÚ¸Éϸ°ûÉúÃü¼ÍÂɵÄÑо¿¡£
¡¾ÔÎÄժ¼¡¿
Nature doi:10.1038/nature09091
Progesterone induces adult mammary stem cell expansion
Purna A. Joshi1, Hartland W. Jackson1, Alexander G. Beristain1, Marco A. Di Grappa1, Patricia Mote2, Christine Clarke2, John Stingl3, Paul D. Waterhouse1 & Rama Khokha1
Reproductive history is the strongest risk factor for breast cancer after age, genetics and breast density1, 2. Increased breast cancer risk is entwined with a greater number of ovarian hormone-dependent reproductive cycles, yet the basis for this predisposition is unknown3, 4, 5. Mammary stem cells (MaSCs) are located within a specialized niche in the basal epithelial compartment that is under local and systemic regulation6. The emerging role of MaSCs in cancer initiation warrants the study of ovarian hormones in MaSC homeostasis. Here we show that the MaSC pool increases 14-fold during maximal progesterone levels at the luteal dioestrus phase of the mouse. Stem-cell-enriched CD49fhi cells amplify at dioestrus, or with exogenous progesterone, demonstrating a key role for progesterone in propelling this expansion. In aged mice, CD49fhi cells display stasis upon cessation of the reproductive cycle. Progesterone drives a series of events where luminal cells probably provide Wnt4 and RANKL signals to basal cells which in turn respond by upregulating their cognate receptors, transcriptional targets and cell cycle markers. Our findings uncover a dynamic role for progesterone in activating adult MaSCs within the mammary stem cell niche during the reproductive cycle, where MaSCs are putative targets for cell transformation events leading to breast cancer.
2. VEçúçêËáõ¥¿ÉÏÔ×ÅÒÖÖÆÖ×Áöϸ°ûÉú³¤
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ ¿ÆÑ§Ê±±¨ Ðû²¼Ê±¼ä£º2010-5-14 9:36:19
¡¡¡¡ÈÕǰ£¬¹þ¶û±õÒ½¿Æ´óѧ¹«¹²ÎÀÉúѧԺ½ÌÊÚÎâÀ¤Ö¸µ¼µÄ¿ÎÌâ×éÔÚѰÕÒάÉúËØEçúçêËáõ¥£¨VES£©ÔÚÖ×Áö»¯Ñ§·ÀÖÎÖеÄ×÷Óü°ÐźŴ«µ¼Í¾¾¶µÄÑо¿Öз¢Ã÷£¬VESÄÜÌØÒìÐÔµØÒÖÖÆÎ¸°©Ï¸°ûµÄÉú³¤ºÍDNAºÏ³É£¬²¢ÓÕµ¼Æä±¬·¢Ï¸°ûµòÍöºÍϸ°û·Ö½â¡£ ¿ÎÌâ×齨ÉèÆðСÊóǰθ°©Ä£×Ó£¬¾¿Ú¹àθ»ò¾¸¹Ç»×¢ÉäVES£¬Ð§¹ûÅú×¢VES¿ÉÏÔÖø½µµÍÖ×ÁöµÄÊýÄ¿ºÍÌå»ý£¬Ìá¸ßʵÑéСÊóµÄÃâÒß¹¦Ð§£»Óë´Ëͬʱ£¬ËûÃÇÔÚÀëÌåÊÔÑéÌõ¼þÏ£¬ÒÔÈËθ°©Ï¸°ûΪ°Ðϸ°û£¬ÊÓ²ìVES¶ÔÆäÉú³¤ÒÖÖÆÇéÐΣ¬Ð§¹ûÒ²ÏÔʾ£¬VESÄÜÏÔ×ÅÒÖÖÆ°©Ï¸°ûµÄÉú³¤¼°DNAºÏ³É£¬Ôö½øÎ¸°©Ï¸°û·Ö½âºÍÓÕµ¼Ï¸°ûµòÍö£¬¶ø¶ÔÕý³£Ï¸°ûÎÞ²»Á¼Ó°Ïì¡£ ÎâÀ¤¿ÎÌâ×é¾ÙÐÐϸ°ûºÍ¶¯ÎïʵÑ飬¿ÆÑ§Ö¤ÊµÁËVESÈ·ÄÜ×èÖ¹Ö×Áöϸ°ûµÄÉú³¤£¬ÑÓÉìºÉÁöСÊóµÄÉúÑÄʱ¼ä¡£ÕâΪÒÔºóVESµÄ×ÊÔ´¿ª·¢¼°ÁÙ´²ÍƹãÓ¦ÓõÓÚ¨Á˼áʵµÄÀíÂÛ»ù´¡¡£
¡¾µãÆÀ¡¿
¡¡¡¡µãÆÀ£ºÎ¬ÉúËØEçúçêËáõ¥ÔÚϸ°ûºÍ¶¯ÎïʵÑéÖÐÏÔʾµÄÒÖÖÆÎ¸°©Ï¸°ûÉú³¤¼°ÓÕµ¼Æä·Ö½â»òµòÍöµÄ¹¦Ð§ÈôÄÜÔÚÈËÌåÉÏÒ²¿´»ñµÃ£¬¾ÍºÜ¿ÉÄÜ»áΪÆäÔÚθ°©µÄÔ¤·ÀÐÔÓªÑøÊ³ÎïÖÐÓ®À´Ò»Ï¯Ö®µØ¡£
3. ·¢Ã÷ÒÖÖÆÎ¸°©µÄÖ÷Òª»ùÒò
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿ Ò½Ò©123 2010-5-13 13:47:02
¡¡¡¡ÉϺ£½»Í¨´óѧҽѧԺÁ¥ÊôÈð½ðҽԺר¼ÒÊ״η¢Ã÷ÁË5ºÅȾɫÌå¶Ì±ÛÉϵÄͬԴºÐ»ùÒòIRX1¶ÔÒÖÖÆÎ¸°©Ï¸°û¾ßÓÐÖ÷Òª×÷Óã¬IRX1µÄ»îÐÔɥʧ¿Éµ¼ÖÂθ°©Ï¸°ûÔöÖ³ÓëÇÖÏ®ÄÜÁ¦ÔöÌí¡£Ñо¿Ö°Ô±·¢Ã÷£¬Í¨¹ýת»ùÒòÊÖÒÕ½«¸Ã»ùÒòµ¼Èëθ°©Ï¸°û£¬Ê¹IRX1»ùÒò»îÐÔ»Ö¸´ºó£¬ÎÞÂÛÊÇÌåÍâ×÷ÓýµÄθ°©Ï¸°û£¬ÕÕ¾ÉСÊó»îÌåÄÚµÄÖ×Áöϸ°û£¬Æä¶ñÐÔÔöÖ³ÓëÇÖÏ®ÄÜÁ¦¾ùÊܵ½ÏÔ×ÅÒÖÖÆ¡£ ¸ÃÑо¿²»µ«Ê×´ÎÌá³öIRX1»ùÒòÔÚθ°©±¬·¢Éú³¤ÖеÄÒÖ°©»ùÒò×÷Ó㬻¹·¢Ã÷ÁËÁíÍâÒ»¸öÖ÷ÒªÕ÷Ï󣬼´£º²»µ«Î¸°©×éÖ¯ÖпÉÒÔ¼ì²âµ½IRX1»ùÒòÆô¶¯×ӵĸ߼׻ù»¯£¬ÔÚθ°©»¼ÕßµÄÍâÖÜѪÓÎÀëDNAÖÐÒ²¿ÉÒÔ¼ì²âµ½IRX1»ùÒòµÄ¸ß¼×»ù»¯¡£ Ñо¿Ö°Ô±ÌåÏÖ£¬´ËÏîÑо¿»ò³ÉΪθ°©Õï¶ÏÐÂÐÍ·Ö×Ó±ê¼ÇÎïµÄÖ÷ÒªÏßË÷¡£
¡¾µãÆÀ¡¿
¡¡¡¡µãÆÀ£ºIRX1»ùÒòÒÖÖÆÎ¸°©µÄ×÷Óü°ÆäÆô¶¯×ӵĸ߼׻ù»¯µÄ¼ÍÂÉʹÆäÓÐÖúÓÚθ°©µÄÕï¶Ï¡£
¡¾ÔÎÄժ¼¡¿
Oncogene doi:10.1038/onc.2010.143
Homeobox gene IRX1 is a tumor suppressor gene in gastric carcinoma
X Guo, W Liu, Y Pan, P Ni, J Ji, L Guo, J Zhang, J Wu, J Jiang, X Chen, Q Cai, J Li, J Zhang, Q Gu, B Liu, Z Zhu and Y Yu
The IRX1 tumor suppressor gene is located on 5p15.33, a cancer susceptibility locus. Loss of heterozygosity of 5p15.33 in gastric cancer was identified in our previous work. In this study, we analyzed the molecular features and function of IRX1. We found that IRX1 expression was lost or reduced in gastric cancer. However, no mutations were identified in IRX1-encoding regions. IRX1 transcription was suppressed by hypermethylation, and the expression of IRX1 mRNA was partially restored in gastric cancer cells after 5-Aza-dC treatment. Restoring IRX1 expression in SGC-7901 and NCI-N87 gastric cancer cells inhibited growth, invasion and tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo. We identified a number of target genes by global microarray analysis after IRX1 transfection combined with real-time PCR and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. BDKRB2, an angiogenesis-related gene, HIST2H2BE and FGF7, cell proliferation and invasion-related genes, were identified as direct IRX1 target genes. The hypermethylation of IRX1 was not only detected in primary gastric cancer tissues but also in the peripheral blood of gastric cancer patients, suggesting IRX1 could potentially serve as a biomarker for gastric cancer.
4. ϸ°ûÓë×éÖ¯ÁÆ·¨ÓëÁÙ´²Ó¦ÓÃÖ®¼äµÄ¾àÀë
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿
¡¡¡¡Ï¸°ûÓë×éÖ¯ÁÆ·¨ÖÐϸ°ûµÄÅбðºÍ¶¨Á¿ÃæÁÙ×ÅÐí¶àÌôÕ½£¬´Ó¹ÜÀíµÄ½Ç¶È¿´£¬ÕâÀàÖÎÁƲ»Ö¹±ØÐèÇå¾²ÓÐÓû¹µÃ¸ßÖÊÁ¿Éú²úÒÔ±ãÄÜ׼ʱÔËËÍ»îϸ°û¡£Ö»¹ÜÎÞ¾úÊÔÑéÊÊÓÃͨÀýµÄÉúÎ﹤ÒÕ£¬Ï¸°ûÓë×éÖ¯ÁÆ·¨ÐèÒª¸üÑÏ¿áµÄÇå¾²²âÊÔ£¬ÌØÊâÊÇÓëʹÓö¯ÎïÖÆÆ·¡¢ÃâÒß·´Ó¦ºÍ³¤Ê±¼ä×÷Óýµ¼ÖµÄDZÔÚ²»ÎȹÌÐÔÓйØÊ±¡£²¢ÇÒ£¬¼øÓÚÆäÎÞÏÞÉú³¤µÄDZÁ¦£¬ÍýÏ뽫ÈËÀàÅßÌ¥¸Éϸ°ûÓÃÓÚÖÎÁƵÄϸ°ûÉú²úÕßÐèÒªÔ½·¢ÑÏ¿á¼à¿Ø×îºóµÄ´¿»¯Àú³Ì¡£
¡¾µãÆÀ¡¿
¡¡¡¡µãÆÀ£ºÏÖÔÚµÄϸ°ûÓë×éÖ¯ÒÆÖ²µÄÁÆ·¨ÃæÁÙÖî¶àÌôÕ½£¬ÏëÒªÀÖ³Éת»¯ÎªÁÙ´²Êµ¼ù»¹µÃÏÈÄÜսʤÕâЩÌôÕ½£¬ÄÜ·ñÀֳɻ¹ºÜÄÑ˵¡£
¡¾ÔÎÄժ¼¡¿STEM CELLS 2010;28:996-1004
Concise Review: Mind the Gap: Challenges in Characterizing and Quantifying Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapies for Clinical Translation
Erin A. Rayment *¶, David J. Williams
There are many challenges associated with characterizing and quantifying cells for use in cell- and tissue-based therapies. From a regulatory perspective, these advanced treatments must not only be safe and effective but also be made by high-quality manufacturing processes that allow for on-time delivery of viable products. Although sterility assays can be adapted from conventional bioprocessing, cell- and tissue-based therapies require more stringent safety assessments, especially in relation to use of animal products, immune reaction, and potential instability due to extended culture times. Furthermore, cell manufacturers who plan to use human embryonic stem cells in their therapies need to be particularly stringent in their final purification steps, due to the unrestricted growth potential of these cells. This review summarizes the current issues in characterization and quantification for cell- and tissue-based therapies, dividing these challenges into the regulatory themes of safety, potency, and manufacturing quality. It outlines current assays in use, as well as highlights the limits of many of these product release tests. Mode of action is discussed, with particular reference to in vitro surrogate assays that can be used to provide information to correlate with proposed in vivo patient efficacy. Importantly, this review highlights the requirement for basic research to improve current knowledge on the in vivo fate of these treatments; as well as an improved stakeholder negotiation process to identify the measurement requirements that will ensure the manufacture of the best possible cell- and tissue-based therapies within the shortest timeframe for the most patient benefit.
5. ³ÉÉú³ÝÇ»ð¤Ä¤¹ÌÓвãÀïÓÐÒ»ÀàиÉϸ°ûȺ
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿
¡¡¡¡³ÉÉú³ÝÇ»ð¤Ä¤¹ÌÓвãÀïÓÐÒ»Àà¾ßÓÐÏÔ×ŵÄÔʼÉñ¾áÕÑù±íÐ͵ÄÔʼ¸Éϸ°ûȺ£¬½«ÆäÒÆÖ²µ½ÓÐÑÏÖØÃâÒßȱÏݵÄÀÏÊóÉíÉÏʱÐγÉÁ˺¬ÓÐÀ´×ÔÁ½ÖÖÅß²ãϸ°ûµÄÖ×Áö¡£ÕâÊǵÚÒ»Àý±¨µÀÓÉÀ´×ÔÁ¼ÐÔ³ÉÈËÉíÌå×éÖ¯µÄ¸Éϸ°ûȺÐγɻìÏýÍâÅß²ãºÍÖÐÅß²ãϸ°ûµÄÖ×Áö¡£
¡¾µãÆÀ¡¿
¡¡¡¡µãÆÀ£º¸Éϸ°ûÒÆÖ²ÐγÉÖ×ÁöµÄΣº¦ÄÑÒÔ×èÖ¹¡£
¡¾ÔÎÄժ¼¡¿STEM CELLS 2010;28:984-995
The Lamina Propria of Adult Human Oral Mucosa Harbors a Novel Stem Cell Population
Keren Marynka-Kalmani 1, Sandra Treves 1, Miri Yafee 1, Heled Rachima 2, Yossi Gafni 1, Malkiel A. Cohen 3, Sandu Pitaru 1 *¶
The highly regenerative capacity of the human adult oral mucosa suggests the existence of a robust stem cell (SC) population in its lamina propria (OMLP). The purpose of this study was to characterize the availability, growth, immunophenotype, and potency of this presumable SC population. Cells positive for the embryonic stem cell transcription factors Oct4 and Sox2 and for p75 formed distinct cord-like structure in the OMLP. Regardless of donor age, trillions of cells, termed human oral mucosa stem cells (hOMSC), 95% of which express mesenchymal stromal cell markers, were simply, and reproducibly produced from a biopsy of 3-4 ¡Á 2 ¡Á 1 mm3. A total of 40-60% of these cells was positive for Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog and 60-80% expressed constitutively neural and neural crest SC markers. hOMSC differentiated in culture into mesodermal (osteoblastic, chondroblastic, and adipocytic), definitive endoderm and ectodermal (neuronal) lineages. Unexpectedly, hOMSC treated with dexamethasone formed tumors consisting of two germ layer-derived tissues when transplanted in severe combined immune deficiency mice. The tumors consisted of tissues produced by neural crest cells during embryogenesis - cartilage, bone, fat, striated muscle, and neural tissue. These results show that the adult OMLP harbors a primitive SC population with a distinct primitive neural-crest like phenotype and identifies the in vivo localization of putative ancestors for this population. This is the first report on ectodermal- and mesodermal-derived mixed tumors formation by a SC population derived from a nonmalignant somatic adult human tissue.
6. ÀÏÊóipsϸ°û12ºÅȾɫÌåÓ¡¼£»ùÒòÒ쳣ĬȻ
¡¾ÕªÒª¡¿
¡¡¡¡½ÏÁ¿ÏàͬÒÅ´«ÈªÔ´µÄÀÏÊóÅßÌ¥¸Éϸ°ûºÍÓÕµ¼¶àÐÑĿϸ°û£¬·¢Ã÷´ó´ó¶¼ÓÕµ¼¶àÐÑĿϸ°ûµÄȾɫÌå12qF1ÉÏDlk1¨CDio3»ùÒò´ØÒ쳣ĬȻ£¬Òò´ËipsÀÏÊó´ó¶àÎÞ·¨Íê³ÉÍêÕû·¢ÓýÀú³Ì¡£ÖµµÃ×¢ÖØµÄÊÇ£¬ÓÃ×éÂѰ×ÍÑÒÒõ£Ã¸ÒÖÖÆ¼Á´¦Öóͷ£µÄDlk1¨CDio3»ùÒò´ØÒ쳣ĬȻµÄipsϸ°û¸Ã»ùÒò´Ø¸´ÉúÄÜÖ§³ÖipsÀÏÊóÍê³ÉÍêÕû·¢ÓýÀú³Ì¡£
¡¾ µãÆÀ¡¿
¡¡¡¡µãÆÀ£º¸ÃÎÄÔÙ´Î֤ʵipsϸ°û×ÔÉí»ùÒòȱÏÝÔì³ÉÆäÎÞ·¨Íê³ÉÍêÕû·¢ÓýÀú³Ì¡£
¡¾ÔÎÄժ¼¡¿Nature, Volume:465,Pages:175¨C181 doi:10.1038/nature09017
Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells
Matthias Stadtfeld, Effie Apostolou, Hidenori Akutsu, et al
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been generated by enforced expression of defined sets of transcription factors in somatic cells. It remains controversial whether iPSCs are molecularly and functionally equivalent to blastocyst-derived embryonic stem (ES) cells. By comparing genetically identical mouse ES cells and iPSCs, we show here that their overall messenger RNA and microRNA expression patterns are indistinguishable with the exception of a few transcripts encoded within the imprinted Dlk1¨CDio3 gene cluster on chromosome 12qF1, which were aberrantly silenced in most of the iPSC clones. Consistent with a developmental role of the Dlk1¨CDio3 gene cluster, these iPSC clones contributed poorly to chimaeras and failed to support the development of entirely iPSC-derived animals (¡®all-iPSC mice¡¯). In contrast, iPSC clones with normal expression of the Dlk1¨CDio3 cluster contributed to high-grade chimaeras and generated viable all-iPSC mice. Notably, treatment of an iPSC clone that had silenced Dlk1¨CDio3 with a histone deacetylase inhibitor reactivated the locus and rescued its ability to support full-term development of all-iPSC mice. Thus, the expression state of a single imprinted gene cluster seems to distinguish most murine iPSCs from ES cells and allows for the prospective identification of iPSC clones that have the full development potential of ES cells.